▪  610.800.0155

GMP Testing Laboratory · Allentown, PA | Build Your Audit Package

Residue control + microbial control

Evidence that clean is truly clean.

PlumGxP builds defensible studies for two different questions: was product or cleaning-agent residue removed, and does the disinfectant perform as intended on your facility surfaces?

Residue recoverySurface efficacyClean hold time
A study built around your process

Separate questions. Coordinated support.

Choose the evidence your program needs.

These studies complement one another, but they are not interchangeable. Each program receives a protocol designed around its own objective, materials, risks, and acceptance criteria.

Program 01

Cleaning Validation & Verification

We use a nonspecific analytical approach—Total Organic Carbon (TOC)—to measure organic residue without requiring a compound-specific assay. The study is designed around your product, cleaning agents, equipment, sampling locations, and scientifically justified limits.

USP <1225>ICH Q2(R2)

Discuss your matrix

01

Analytical method validation

Validation characteristics are selected for the intended use of the TOC method and may include specificity, linearity, range, accuracy, precision, detection limit, quantitation limit, and robustness.

02

Swab recovery studies

Recovery is evaluated from representative equipment materials at defined surface areas, using the selected swab, solvent, technique, and extraction conditions.

03

Rinse recovery studies

Where rinse sampling is appropriate, we evaluate recovery in the proposed rinse matrix and conditions to support meaningful residue results.

04

Routine verification

Once the method and recovery approach are established, PlumGxP can support scheduled or campaign-based verification samples for continued process oversight.

05

Clean-hold studies

We can test defined time points after cleaning to help establish how long equipment or surfaces may remain clean before use or before re-cleaning is required.

06

Protocol through report

Clear study design, predefined criteria, controlled execution, calculations, deviations when applicable, and a decision-ready final report.

A connected study—not a collection of isolated tests

Define residues, surfaces and limits
Develop the TOC approach
Validate analytical performance
Establish swab and/or rinse recovery
Execute verification and report

Program 02

Disinfectant Studies

Hard-surface disinfectant efficacy studies are designed to reflect the way products are actually prepared and used in your facility—on representative surfaces, at defined concentrations and contact times, against relevant challenge organisms.

USP <1072>Hard-surface studies
01

Representative surfaces

Coupons can represent stainless steel, glass, wall and flooring materials, or other facility-specific hard surfaces included in the study rationale.

02

Relevant organisms

The challenge panel can combine compendial organisms with environmental isolates selected from your facility trends and contamination-control risks.

03

Defined use conditions

Concentration, preparation, application, wet contact time, surface condition, and other study variables are documented and controlled.

04

Recovery validation

The recovery process is assessed so the study can reliably recover surviving microorganisms from the test surface.

05

Neutralization validation

We demonstrate that the neutralizer stops residual antimicrobial activity without being toxic to the challenge organism—protecting the validity of the observed result.

06

Clean-hold support

Clean-hold studies can be incorporated to evaluate microbial conditions across defined time intervals after cleaning and before use.

Go beyond ideal conditions

Optional challenges for a more robust program

A useful study can deliberately examine foreseeable departures from the ideal procedure—not only a freshly opened product prepared perfectly.

Near-expiry productEvaluate disinfectant or cleaning agent close to its labeled expiration.
Post-expiry challengeAssess an expired product as a controlled worst-case data point when scientifically appropriate—not as authorization for routine use.
Low concentrationChallenge a defined under-strength preparation to model potential dilution or mixing error.
Minimum contact timeTest the shortest proposed wet contact time rather than an ideal extended exposure.
Facility isolatesAdd representative environmental organisms that matter to your own program.
Aged preparationEvaluate prepared-use solutions at a justified in-use age or holding condition.

Start with the process

Build a study that answers the question your Quality Unit will ask.

Bring us your product, surfaces, cleaning procedure, disinfectant rotation, or an early study concept. We will help define a practical path from protocol to final report.

Start a conversation